Thursday, December 3, 2009

tori johnson rough draft : 2001

“A Space Odyssey” is a very important scientific fiction film from the late 1960’s. The film was the first of many to be created to show us viewers the evolution we have been through. The film was a collaborative project between Stanley Kubrick and sci-fi author Arthur C. Clarke.  “A Space Odyssey” is considered by many as the best film ever made. It is a story of discoveries made, of potentials realized, of obstacles overcome, and of ends opening doorways to new beginnings. It has set the standard for many science fiction films that followed.  This film shows the viewers what humankind has been able to do and discover through evolution and defies traditional expectations.  The film seems to be very inspiring, but is definitely not a thrill ride. The lack of dialogue creates much more boredom than other films.

            Early in the film Kubrick shows the first of what he believes to have lived on the earth before humans, apes. These apes represent the beginning of the earth as the first creatures to live. These apes slowly evolved from animal to man. This is the idea of evolution and many people now a day are skeptical as to whether or not this is true. Thinking this idea is a bit ridiculous; I did not find this part of the film very interesting. As the movie progresses so does mankind, and being able to fly to the moon is a huge accomplishment for humans. When a large black monolith is found beneath the surface of the moon, the initial reaction is that someone buried it there. Then is when Dr. Bowman discovers more about the monoliths.

Along with humans, technology is slowly increasing. According to Larry Cousins, now there is a race between computers (HAL) and human (Dr. Bowman).  Having such an advanced computer seems good at first, with no problems or glitches in its records, until it slowly starts to try and take over. By doing things like not unlocking the door for Dr. Bowman and his fellow space mate to trying to control the entire flight, its starts to worry the astronauts. With this part of the film I think Kubrick was trying to show the audience what could potentially happen if computers were so advanced they could take over.

            With that the end of the movie comes into play. A life style and home controlled totally on technology speeds up Dr. Bowman’s aging process faster than the normal human. He is totally and completely alone and is slowly dying. The thought of this is not very appealing to me because I can’t imagine a life based largely on technology. According to Rob Humanick from Slant Magazine, “in all films, a climactic, organized sequence of alien landscapes, exploding nebulae, and wafting tides of organic space that practically leaps off the screen. Putting to shame the comparatively shallow thrills of virtually every blockbuster ever made.”  Although most critics and people find this film extravagant and outstanding I would have to disagree. To me the film was very slow and not very amusing. The music was very old and was very general, not standing out to me.

            

4 comments:

  1. The film doesn't really show the whole course of evolution. Who said the film was the best film ever made? That's a strong statement.

    The second part of your first paragraph is full of generalities. Specifically, what is the plot, the storyline?

    Apes aren't shown as the first animals. Other animals are around. Also, most people aren't skeptical of evolution, although it is still controversial for some people.

    Dave Bowman doesn't know anything about the monolith until after he disables HAL. Also where did you get the idea that his technology-dependent lifestyle ages him?

    You end by saying the film is slow, but you really didn't discuss this. You say it wasn't amusing, but it wasn't meant to be. The you say th music was old and very general--so what if it's old and what do you mean by general? You hadn't discussed the music at all.

    Set criteria, then judge the movie.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wish you explain more why you dislike it more than just giving an overview of the entire film. You do bring up some good points and they could certainly be used in your rreaction

    ReplyDelete
  3. I didn't think the paper was very well put together. Most of the time you were just stating things but then not elaborating on them. This paper is for you to discuss why you did or did not enjoy the film, you say you did not but don't really back it up. Also some of your statements about the movie are false and I think they are not interpreted the way they are supposed to be, such as you saying Dr. Bowman was dying because of technology. I think you just need to fully explain your opinions and get the facts about the movie right and this will be a great paper.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I thought you were off to an decent start with your paper but it is way too general to actually be considered a good review. You started off the paper very well by giving some background information so readers know what you are reviewing. After that you made a lot of general statements that do not specify what was good or bad about the movie. Overall I think you had the right ideas that you want to keep going with but you definitely need to elaborate.

    ReplyDelete